<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lost Art of Reading Directions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cogdogblog.com/2004/03/28/the-lost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2004/03/28/the-lost/</link>
	<description>Alan Levine&#039;s space for barking about and playing with technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:01:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Brophy</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2004/03/28/the-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Brophy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2004/03/28/the-lost-art-of-reading-directions/#comment-475</guid>
		<description>In all the times I&#039;ve watched people use a web application in a usability test, no one has read the text.* They seem to look for the next thing to click on each page, and they either find something to click that they think will bring them closer to their goal in a few seconds or the click the back button and start over. 



So what they end up reading is everything that is bold or a link (I&#039;ve never tried making everything bold and a link, but I doubt that would work!). 



I&#039;m working on a gradebook tool for Sakai. We are going to deliver a user interface for the tool to the developers in May. Do you have any suggestions in mind after your experience with WebCT? We&#039;ll try to keep the number of clicks under control, of course!



*OK I saw one person read the text, and she read every single word on every page and it took for ever for her to finish the usability test...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all the times I&#8217;ve watched people use a web application in a usability test, no one has read the text.* They seem to look for the next thing to click on each page, and they either find something to click that they think will bring them closer to their goal in a few seconds or the click the back button and start over. </p>
<p>So what they end up reading is everything that is bold or a link (I&#8217;ve never tried making everything bold and a link, but I doubt that would work!). </p>
<p>I&#8217;m working on a gradebook tool for Sakai. We are going to deliver a user interface for the tool to the developers in May. Do you have any suggestions in mind after your experience with WebCT? We&#8217;ll try to keep the number of clicks under control, of course!</p>
<p>*OK I saw one person read the text, and she read every single word on every page and it took for ever for her to finish the usability test&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

