I feel pretty much late to the dance with podcasting. It is a technology phenomnma that seems like it happened more or less while I was out of the country 3 weeks in November. My colleagues D’Arcy and Brian are all over it, and I have give high credence to things my trusted colleagues get excited about.
But I’m not quite ready to join in yet– maybe it’s because I do not have an iPod ;-) Before I gripe, let me say what I like about the podcasting and its buzz:
* It’s a wild spreading net meme- it is grass roots. It did not originate from Microsoft or some MIT lab, it happened in the user space of the web.
* It rolls together small pieces of existing and available technology, is enabled by ever evolving open source software, distributes with RSS.
* It offers ordinary folks a creative space, a broadcasting platform, much like blogging opened up the web publshing platform.
* It is personal- there is something very human about hearing a real person’s voice (not a velvet voiced announcer).
I’ve tapped into a few podcasts recently to sample the waters…. the MP3 I recently listened to this morning was an interview, and there was at least 3 minutes of banter about weather, cities, chit chat, what kind of microphones were being used, coughing, phone call interrupts all very nice for the people ion the conversation (all 2 of them), but even as the conversation moved into the topic I had selected via a feed, the level of information density (in the Tuftian sense) can be really low. In fact, the audio faded to the level of background noise as I focused on more relevant tasks (trying to wrap presents… I cannot tie a bow if my life depended on it).
I feel the same way about downloading fat PowerPoints from presentations I missed- there is really not much there without the speaker. And when I tap into some of the audio versions of presentations, it seems also drawn out, rambling, and low on information density. Now it is not to see that everything needs to be bursting with reams of info, but if it is not intriguing, compelling, provocative, challenging, well, it is as much fascination as listening in on people’s cell phone calls in the market as shopping lists are recited (“lettuce… musturd… Cheerios… toliet paper, yes the soft stuff…”). What makes compelling audio? Either great personalities or great content.
I don’t have a long bus ride, or even a commute, or heck even enough constipation to sit and listen to people talking. Or maybe its because I do not have an iPod.
No, I am not jumping over poor quality recordings or amateur production. It’s just that I lack time to sift through a linear media to find the beef. And that is my whinge- that the form of the information can be unbundled, broken into smaller bits, re-mixed, or internally linked. How would I direct my students to a pertinent 2 minute section of a 19 minute audio cast? I liked a few months back how John Udell had touched on that with a demo of a way to provide URL links to a segment of a .mp3– see Prime Time Multimedia.
You cannot really interact with a podcast, or comment on it, or participate in any way beyond listening. It is just there, a glut to listen to, ignore, or just store.
I am all for generating some excitement about podcasts, and thinking more broadly about RSS enclosures (how about wrapping in a reference to a learning object??)– but at the same time think we ought to think about the kind of content works well in that media form. People talking about things I can read and skim in an RSS reader, well…. Yawn. Chit chat and drabble that mean more to the talker than the listener… yawn.
But using it for interviews, debates, student audio reflections or reports, bringing external experts, mixing in languages and voices of other cultures… that could add value. If I am absorbing content by audio form, it should be because it presents it in a way that extends the information in fresh ways.
Maybe I need an iPod.
It’s all too early to be making firm decisions in a moving, evolving technology. Despite the words above, there is more about the phenomenon I like than dislike, and heck, it is a technology just out of the womb, dripping with amniotic fluid. I am listening more and reading what others are doing… and maybe I’ll be joining the dance soon…
… as soon as I get an iPod?
The post "Yawncasting" was originally assembled from spare parts of a 1957 Chevy at CogDogBlog (http://cogdogblog.com/2004/12/yawncasting/) on December 19, 2004.