<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Staid Organization That Just Does Not Get It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cogdogblog.com/2005/07/15/chronicle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2005/07/15/chronicle/</link>
	<description>Alan Levine Barks Here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:13:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: D'Arcy Norman</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2005/07/15/chronicle/comment-page-1/#comment-1562</link>
		<dc:creator>D'Arcy Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 21:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=998#comment-1562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unbelievable. Someone needs to hit Ivan Tribble with a cluetrain. Oh, and what&#039;s up with an academic hiding behind a pseudonym? Freaking coward.

It&#039;s a &lt;em&gt;conversation&lt;/em&gt;, you silly maroon!

What Ivan didn&#039;t mention was that the hiring committee should have expressed relief at being able to know incompatible applications before hiring them - something that was apparently impossible for them before blogging.

How many people get jobs because of blogging? I&#039;d guess it&#039;s far more than the number that are passed over because of blogging. I don&#039;t think anyone has really missed out on a job because of a blog - they missed out because they were incompatible, and the blog just made that discovery more efficient. Same as the &quot;fired for blogging&quot; meme that went around a few months ago...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unbelievable. Someone needs to hit Ivan Tribble with a cluetrain. Oh, and what&#8217;s up with an academic hiding behind a pseudonym? Freaking coward.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a <em>conversation</em>, you silly maroon!</p>
<p>What Ivan didn&#8217;t mention was that the hiring committee should have expressed relief at being able to know incompatible applications before hiring them &#8211; something that was apparently impossible for them before blogging.</p>
<p>How many people get jobs because of blogging? I&#8217;d guess it&#8217;s far more than the number that are passed over because of blogging. I don&#8217;t think anyone has really missed out on a job because of a blog &#8211; they missed out because they were incompatible, and the blog just made that discovery more efficient. Same as the &#8220;fired for blogging&#8221; meme that went around a few months ago&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
