<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s That Smell? Is it My LinkRank?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cogdogblog.com/2005/09/30/my-linkrank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2005/09/30/my-linkrank/</link>
	<description>Alan Levine&#039;s space for barking about and playing with technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:29:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Wyman</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2005/09/30/my-linkrank/comment-page-1/#comment-1926</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Wyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 20:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=1125#comment-1926</guid>
		<description>D&#039;Arcy: Daily LinkRanks are intentionally volatile since that volatility is required to accurately reflect the daily changes in popularity, importance, etc. of sites. This is why we also compute 15/30 (and soon 60) day average LinkRanks. When you average the volatile daily numbers over a period of time, you get a much less volatile number. However, it is important to realize that the daily numbers and the &quot;period based&quot; numbers are telling you different things. 

bob wyman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D&#8217;Arcy: Daily LinkRanks are intentionally volatile since that volatility is required to accurately reflect the daily changes in popularity, importance, etc. of sites. This is why we also compute 15/30 (and soon 60) day average LinkRanks. When you average the volatile daily numbers over a period of time, you get a much less volatile number. However, it is important to realize that the daily numbers and the &#8220;period based&#8221; numbers are telling you different things. </p>
<p>bob wyman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D'Arcy Norman</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2005/09/30/my-linkrank/comment-page-1/#comment-1925</link>
		<dc:creator>D'Arcy Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 23:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=1125#comment-1925</guid>
		<description>PubSub linkrank seems a bit volatile, and I&#039;m not sure how accurate it is...

Check out the oscillations on my nook of the &#039;net
http://www.pubsub.com/site_stats.php?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.darcynorman.net

Almost as volatile as BlogShares :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PubSub linkrank seems a bit volatile, and I&#8217;m not sure how accurate it is&#8230;</p>
<p>Check out the oscillations on my nook of the &#8216;net<br />
<a href="http://www.pubsub.com/site_stats.php?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.darcynorman.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.pubsub.com/site_stats.php?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.darcynorman.net</a></p>
<p>Almost as volatile as BlogShares :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

