<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windoze Ate My Saturday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cogdogblog.com/2006/05/06/windoze-ate-my-saturday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2006/05/06/windoze-ate-my-saturday/</link>
	<description>Alan Levine&#039;s space for barking about and playing with technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:01:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan V.</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2006/05/06/windoze-ate-my-saturday/comment-page-1/#comment-5180</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 19:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2006/05/06/windoze-ate-my-saturday/#comment-5180</guid>
		<description>Hah. Linux zealots call us Windows users names when we can&#039;t find our way through bash, so I wonder what they&#039;d say when you cannot find your way through a CMD console. LOL. I&#039;m envious...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah. Linux zealots call us Windows users names when we can&#8217;t find our way through bash, so I wonder what they&#8217;d say when you cannot find your way through a CMD console. LOL. I&#8217;m envious&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gardner</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2006/05/06/windoze-ate-my-saturday/comment-page-1/#comment-5110</link>
		<dc:creator>Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 03:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2006/05/06/windoze-ate-my-saturday/#comment-5110</guid>
		<description>Dr. Glu here. I started with DOS 3.3 many light-years ago, so cryptic stuff from that corner doesn&#039;t throw me so much, though I do get angry when things don&#039;t work correctly. 

I do not, though, claim moral superiority for DOS or WinXP or any operating system, though I remember OS/2 and AmigaDOS fondly. :-)

Perspective, CogDog, perspective. Try to install OSX on a Windows machine. Ah, okay, that&#039;s a violation of the OSX EULA. Guess we won&#039;t know what kinds of blue screens that would cause. 

Really, the thinking behind these two platforms is essentially different. Apple does a near-complete lockdown and gets to &quot;it just works,&quot; with &quot;it&quot; defined entirely by Apple. IBM/Windows is completely open-standards and gets healthy CPU competition between Intel and AMD, highly commoditized and cheap and plentiful user-installable upgrades and peripherals from many different manufacturers, and a significantly cheaper bottom line (though Apple is doing better these days). But the diversity breeds certain opportunities for chaos and hair-pulling. Windows machines think of applications as running on their platform. Macs think of apps as part of their platform--the app is the platform, almost. I wouldn&#039;t claim superiority for either idea, but they do think of the end user experience rather differently. And I&#039;ve never understood the logic behind ejecting a CD-ROM by dragging it to the Trash icon, just as I&#039;ve never understood how any user would expect to shut down Windows by clicking on the &quot;start&quot; icon.

Now what does that have to do with your current woes? Maybe not much. Since Apple doesn&#039;t support WinXP on their machine (that of course would be clean contrary to everything their business plan insists on) even though they do make it possible to install WinXP, I think you&#039;ve fallen between two stools. All I can say is that I do not myself routinely have the troubles you describe, though I have had my share of Windows woes.

Hang in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Glu here. I started with DOS 3.3 many light-years ago, so cryptic stuff from that corner doesn&#8217;t throw me so much, though I do get angry when things don&#8217;t work correctly. </p>
<p>I do not, though, claim moral superiority for DOS or WinXP or any operating system, though I remember OS/2 and AmigaDOS fondly. :-)</p>
<p>Perspective, CogDog, perspective. Try to install OSX on a Windows machine. Ah, okay, that&#8217;s a violation of the OSX EULA. Guess we won&#8217;t know what kinds of blue screens that would cause. </p>
<p>Really, the thinking behind these two platforms is essentially different. Apple does a near-complete lockdown and gets to &#8220;it just works,&#8221; with &#8220;it&#8221; defined entirely by Apple. IBM/Windows is completely open-standards and gets healthy CPU competition between Intel and AMD, highly commoditized and cheap and plentiful user-installable upgrades and peripherals from many different manufacturers, and a significantly cheaper bottom line (though Apple is doing better these days). But the diversity breeds certain opportunities for chaos and hair-pulling. Windows machines think of applications as running on their platform. Macs think of apps as part of their platform&#8211;the app is the platform, almost. I wouldn&#8217;t claim superiority for either idea, but they do think of the end user experience rather differently. And I&#8217;ve never understood the logic behind ejecting a CD-ROM by dragging it to the Trash icon, just as I&#8217;ve never understood how any user would expect to shut down Windows by clicking on the &#8220;start&#8221; icon.</p>
<p>Now what does that have to do with your current woes? Maybe not much. Since Apple doesn&#8217;t support WinXP on their machine (that of course would be clean contrary to everything their business plan insists on) even though they do make it possible to install WinXP, I think you&#8217;ve fallen between two stools. All I can say is that I do not myself routinely have the troubles you describe, though I have had my share of Windows woes.</p>
<p>Hang in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel Guhlin</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2006/05/06/windoze-ate-my-saturday/comment-page-1/#comment-5109</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Guhlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 02:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2006/05/06/windoze-ate-my-saturday/#comment-5109</guid>
		<description>You have my sympathies! Why don&#039;t you load Ubuntu Linux 5.10 on a partition and be done with Windows? Do you really need it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have my sympathies! Why don&#8217;t you load Ubuntu Linux 5.10 on a partition and be done with Windows? Do you really need it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

