<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You a Contactomaniac?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cogdogblog.com/2006/11/30/contactomaniac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2006/11/30/contactomaniac/</link>
	<description>Alan Levine's blog space for barking about instructional technology</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2006/11/30/contactomaniac/#comment-13104</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 05:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2006/11/30/are-you-a-contactomaniac/#comment-13104</guid>
		<description>I'm a comment whore.  You're brave for using that word on your blog .. everytime I use words like that I get trackback porn spam.  Yuck.

But, I've been wondering about that same issue lately.  I'm not a contact whore in flickr because the more contacts you have, the less efficient if you use your contacts for any type of communication purpose. (Although there is a flickr tool that lets you easily navigate contacts similar to the flickrleech) Case in point, I used some of my contacts for my recently successful widget fundraising campaign.

Anyway, to answer your question ... I look at their photos, if I know them, I make them a contact/friend.  If I don't them, but after looking at their profile they appear to work for nonprofit, edtech, library tech, etc., I'll make them a contact.  

There was a bit a research recently about how many contacts your brain can handle .. 150 was the number.  It was in a roundup of posts on the topic of "Social media burnout"
http://beth.typepad.com/beths_blog/2006/11/social_media_bu_1.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a comment whore.  You&#8217;re brave for using that word on your blog .. everytime I use words like that I get trackback porn spam.  Yuck.</p>
<p>But, I&#8217;ve been wondering about that same issue lately.  I&#8217;m not a contact whore in flickr because the more contacts you have, the less efficient if you use your contacts for any type of communication purpose. (Although there is a flickr tool that lets you easily navigate contacts similar to the flickrleech) Case in point, I used some of my contacts for my recently successful widget fundraising campaign.</p>
<p>Anyway, to answer your question &#8230; I look at their photos, if I know them, I make them a contact/friend.  If I don&#8217;t them, but after looking at their profile they appear to work for nonprofit, edtech, library tech, etc., I&#8217;ll make them a contact.  </p>
<p>There was a bit a research recently about how many contacts your brain can handle .. 150 was the number.  It was in a roundup of posts on the topic of &#8220;Social media burnout&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://beth.typepad.com/beths_blog/2006/11/social_media_bu_1.html" rel="nofollow">http://beth.typepad.com/beths_blog/2006/11/social_media_bu_1.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatrickQG</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2006/11/30/contactomaniac/#comment-13096</link>
		<dc:creator>PatrickQG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2006/11/30/are-you-a-contactomaniac/#comment-13096</guid>
		<description>Oh yes, the strange ways people find your photos is impressive. Especially when you haven't actually tagged them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, the strange ways people find your photos is impressive. Especially when you haven&#8217;t actually tagged them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2006/11/30/contactomaniac/#comment-13095</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2006/11/30/are-you-a-contactomaniac/#comment-13095</guid>
		<description>D'Arcy - the 40,000 was a PhotoShop fudging -- off by a factor of 1000 from my list.

What's even more odd are the ways people find your photos for their obscure pools -- recently I was asked to join the "Mixer Truck" group: from one photo I have of a cement truck
http://flickr.com/groups/mixers/

And then there are 121 people into graffiti on plants:
http://flickr.com/groups/vegaffiti/

A niche for everything and then some</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D&#8217;Arcy - the 40,000 was a PhotoShop fudging &#8212; off by a factor of 1000 from my list.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s even more odd are the ways people find your photos for their obscure pools &#8212; recently I was asked to join the &#8220;Mixer Truck&#8221; group: from one photo I have of a cement truck<br />
<a href="http://flickr.com/groups/mixers/" rel="nofollow">http://flickr.com/groups/mixers/</a></p>
<p>And then there are 121 people into graffiti on plants:<br />
<a href="http://flickr.com/groups/vegaffiti/" rel="nofollow">http://flickr.com/groups/vegaffiti/</a></p>
<p>A niche for everything and then some</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatrickQG</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2006/11/30/contactomaniac/#comment-13085</link>
		<dc:creator>PatrickQG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2006/11/30/are-you-a-contactomaniac/#comment-13085</guid>
		<description>I'm of the "check out their photos first, and then... wait a while". Conveniently most of the people who add me as a contact seem to take good photos, so they ended up being added.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m of the &#8220;check out their photos first, and then&#8230; wait a while&#8221;. Conveniently most of the people who add me as a contact seem to take good photos, so they ended up being added.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D'Arcy Norman</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2006/11/30/contactomaniac/#comment-13084</link>
		<dc:creator>D'Arcy Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2006/11/30/are-you-a-contactomaniac/#comment-13084</guid>
		<description>I use contacts rather judiciously. It's not "I've seen this person's photos" to me, it's more "I know this person". Especially combined with the access permissions associated with having a Friend in Flickr, it seems reckless to grant Contact status to anyone that can click a link.  40,000 contacts? Really? I don't have that many in real life, never mind the subset of people I'd consider Contacts that also have Flickr accounts...

There's a similar concept in Facebook, but I think it also gets overused to the point that it's meaningless. Elgg has a similar thing, too, but I don't know how well it gets used/abused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use contacts rather judiciously. It&#8217;s not &#8220;I&#8217;ve seen this person&#8217;s photos&#8221; to me, it&#8217;s more &#8220;I know this person&#8221;. Especially combined with the access permissions associated with having a Friend in Flickr, it seems reckless to grant Contact status to anyone that can click a link.  40,000 contacts? Really? I don&#8217;t have that many in real life, never mind the subset of people I&#8217;d consider Contacts that also have Flickr accounts&#8230;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a similar concept in Facebook, but I think it also gets overused to the point that it&#8217;s meaningless. Elgg has a similar thing, too, but I don&#8217;t know how well it gets used/abused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
