<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LimitedIn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cogdogblog.com/2007/02/02/limitedin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2007/02/02/limitedin/</link>
	<description>Alan Levine's blog space for barking about instructional technology</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: No LinkedIn For You &#187; CogDogBlog</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2007/02/02/limitedin/#comment-48720</link>
		<dc:creator>No LinkedIn For You &#187; CogDogBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2007/02/02/limitedin/#comment-48720</guid>
		<description>[...] been a while since I barked about the clumsiness of LinkedIn but just had another one of those near deaths by lame interface design. But before that, i am still [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been a while since I barked about the clumsiness of LinkedIn but just had another one of those near deaths by lame interface design. But before that, i am still [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four out of Five Social Networks Surveyed Said&#8230; &#187; CogDogBlog</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2007/02/02/limitedin/#comment-44378</link>
		<dc:creator>Four out of Five Social Networks Surveyed Said&#8230; &#187; CogDogBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 04:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2007/02/02/limitedin/#comment-44378</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve knocked LinkedIn around a lot in the past and remain mostly un-enamored, but give some credit for a few improvements here and there; nonetheless, the overriding reason to link in linked in is to increase the number of linkedin links one has. I&#8217;m non-plussed at social networking sites that exist for nothing more than connecting. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve knocked LinkedIn around a lot in the past and remain mostly un-enamored, but give some credit for a few improvements here and there; nonetheless, the overriding reason to link in linked in is to increase the number of linkedin links one has. I&#8217;m non-plussed at social networking sites that exist for nothing more than connecting. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2007/02/02/limitedin/#comment-23762</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 04:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2007/02/02/limitedin/#comment-23762</guid>
		<description>Thought this might be of interest  ...
http://www.financialaidpodcast.com/2007/02/05/what-is-twitter/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought this might be of interest  &#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.financialaidpodcast.com/2007/02/05/what-is-twitter/" rel="nofollow">http://www.financialaidpodcast.com/2007/02/05/what-is-twitter/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DArcy Norman</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2007/02/02/limitedin/#comment-23398</link>
		<dc:creator>DArcy Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 02:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2007/02/02/limitedin/#comment-23398</guid>
		<description>sweet googly googly. Linked In has done everything they could to block the process of creating links. I have to look up the email address for someone that's already in the system? WTF? What a stupid decision that is. Flickr Friends are much easier to make. My del.icio.us network is easier to manage. And neither of those tools use those links as the single reason to use the site. LinkedIn really needs to work on their design and the workflow of actually making links...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sweet googly googly. Linked In has done everything they could to block the process of creating links. I have to look up the email address for someone that&#8217;s already in the system? WTF? What a stupid decision that is. Flickr Friends are much easier to make. My del.icio.us network is easier to manage. And neither of those tools use those links as the single reason to use the site. LinkedIn really needs to work on their design and the workflow of actually making links&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
