<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google We Have a Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/25/google-we-have-a-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/25/google-we-have-a-problem/</link>
	<description>Alan Levine's blog space for barking about instructional technology</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 5tein</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/25/google-we-have-a-problem/#comment-49565</link>
		<dc:creator>5tein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/25/google-we-have-a-problem/#comment-49565</guid>
		<description>Stephen said, "...it’s just so tacky. So putrid. So vile. People ask me why I am so ant-capitalism (etc) and I point to spam, and I say *this* is what they think is appropriate."

I share this ill feeling when I watch commercials on television, and actually hate those more than I hate spam, because while spam may be more virulent in some of its strains, for the most part it's quiet and easy to ignore.  My position on it, however, is that consumers are going to grow so sick of it that they develop "banner blindness" to it in any and all forms, and thus it will ultimately be deemed a waste of time and money by the corporate sponsors.  The nice thing about the connected world we are building is it allows for individuals to instantly search for, save, personalize, and control their own access to products and services, making in-your-face and often misleading advertising a thing of the past.  I may be the idealistic capitalist in saying so, but I truly believe that sort of populism will whittle away at the annoyance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen said, &#8220;&#8230;it’s just so tacky. So putrid. So vile. People ask me why I am so ant-capitalism (etc) and I point to spam, and I say *this* is what they think is appropriate.&#8221;</p>
<p>I share this ill feeling when I watch commercials on television, and actually hate those more than I hate spam, because while spam may be more virulent in some of its strains, for the most part it&#8217;s quiet and easy to ignore.  My position on it, however, is that consumers are going to grow so sick of it that they develop &#8220;banner blindness&#8221; to it in any and all forms, and thus it will ultimately be deemed a waste of time and money by the corporate sponsors.  The nice thing about the connected world we are building is it allows for individuals to instantly search for, save, personalize, and control their own access to products and services, making in-your-face and often misleading advertising a thing of the past.  I may be the idealistic capitalist in saying so, but I truly believe that sort of populism will whittle away at the annoyance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 益学会 &#62; OLDaily 中文版 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2007年11月26日 重写规则，Camtasia协议，blog将死，OLPC教育计划，Kindle</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/25/google-we-have-a-problem/#comment-39989</link>
		<dc:creator>益学会 &#62; OLDaily 中文版 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2007年11月26日 重写规则，Camtasia协议，blog将死，OLPC教育计划，Kindle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 05:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/25/google-we-have-a-problem/#comment-39989</guid>
		<description>[...] 是时候书写属于我们自己的规则了 回应Facebook近期的喧哗（见后续内容），Doc Searles在这个帖子和随后的帖子中， 主张我们应该“停止祈求Facebook和Google为我们解决问题”，“是时候创造某些新的参与规则了－－一些象它们一样有效的规则。” 的确如此。但与此同时，大量的金钱却被耗费来阻止这种现象的发生。人们花钱让我们购买专业的电子书阅读器，花钱阻止开源应用被用于孩子的教育，花钱使我们去相信我们所拥有的“给予和分享”等价值观，实际上并不道德，而等同于偷窃。让我表述得更清楚些：我赞同Searles，这就是为什么我曾建议“远离Google的一天”。还想说明，这并不是一种姿态，需要实际行动。Doc Searles, Weblog November 26, 2007 [原文链接] [Tags: Books, Google, Open Source] [参与评论] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 是时候书写属于我们自己的规则了 回应Facebook近期的喧哗（见后续内容），Doc Searles在这个帖子和随后的帖子中， 主张我们应该“停止祈求Facebook和Google为我们解决问题”，“是时候创造某些新的参与规则了－－一些象它们一样有效的规则。” 的确如此。但与此同时，大量的金钱却被耗费来阻止这种现象的发生。人们花钱让我们购买专业的电子书阅读器，花钱阻止开源应用被用于孩子的教育，花钱使我们去相信我们所拥有的“给予和分享”等价值观，实际上并不道德，而等同于偷窃。让我表述得更清楚些：我赞同Searles，这就是为什么我曾建议“远离Google的一天”。还想说明，这并不是一种姿态，需要实际行动。Doc Searles, Weblog November 26, 2007 [原文链接] [Tags: Books, Google, Open Source] [参与评论] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Downes</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/25/google-we-have-a-problem/#comment-39760</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/25/google-we-have-a-problem/#comment-39760</guid>
		<description>I just encountered this site...
http://whydiggisblocked.com/

From Digg, naturally
http://digg.com/tech_news/Why_Digg_is_Blocked

and it occurs to me that we have, collectively, the answer in our own hands: block Google.

Oh I know, nobody wants to do that, it's the kiss of internet death - but it might be worth doing it for one day, just to make a point.

Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just encountered this site&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://whydiggisblocked.com/" rel="nofollow">http://whydiggisblocked.com/</a></p>
<p>From Digg, naturally<br />
<a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/Why_Digg_is_Blocked" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/tech_news/Why_Digg_is_Blocked</a></p>
<p>and it occurs to me that we have, collectively, the answer in our own hands: block Google.</p>
<p>Oh I know, nobody wants to do that, it&#8217;s the kiss of internet death - but it might be worth doing it for one day, just to make a point.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Carding</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/25/google-we-have-a-problem/#comment-39754</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Carding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/25/google-we-have-a-problem/#comment-39754</guid>
		<description>In the last couple of weeks google has altered its page rank algorithm to deal with link spammers. A lot of  people's pagerank dropped dramticaly as a result. I guess Google are trusting to natural selection to weed the garden...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the last couple of weeks google has altered its page rank algorithm to deal with link spammers. A lot of  people&#8217;s pagerank dropped dramticaly as a result. I guess Google are trusting to natural selection to weed the garden&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec Couros</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/25/google-we-have-a-problem/#comment-39742</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec Couros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/25/google-we-have-a-problem/#comment-39742</guid>
		<description>I'm getting tons of the same stuff, and sometimes it's only minutes after I post. It's driving me nuts. I'm with you, something needs to be done ... spam harvesters don't cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting tons of the same stuff, and sometimes it&#8217;s only minutes after I post. It&#8217;s driving me nuts. I&#8217;m with you, something needs to be done &#8230; spam harvesters don&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Downes</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/25/google-we-have-a-problem/#comment-39736</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/25/google-we-have-a-problem/#comment-39736</guid>
		<description>I'm just really tired of it in general - in my email, in my blog, everywhere I look.

And - it's just so tacky. So putrid. So vile. People ask me why I am so ant-capitalism (etc) and I point to spam, and I say *this* is what they think is appropriate.

We need to design against spam. Google won't help us. And even if Google did, some other company would come along to monetize it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just really tired of it in general - in my email, in my blog, everywhere I look.</p>
<p>And - it&#8217;s just so tacky. So putrid. So vile. People ask me why I am so ant-capitalism (etc) and I point to spam, and I say *this* is what they think is appropriate.</p>
<p>We need to design against spam. Google won&#8217;t help us. And even if Google did, some other company would come along to monetize it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Craft</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/25/google-we-have-a-problem/#comment-39735</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Craft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/25/google-we-have-a-problem/#comment-39735</guid>
		<description>I've recently been having the exact same problem. What I want to know is how to deal with it! I've got Spam Karma 2 turned to Supastrong on trackback spam and still get it like crazy. 

How are you handling this because I am ready to turn off trackbacks entirely!

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently been having the exact same problem. What I want to know is how to deal with it! I&#8217;ve got Spam Karma 2 turned to Supastrong on trackback spam and still get it like crazy. </p>
<p>How are you handling this because I am ready to turn off trackbacks entirely!</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
