<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Reason to Be Plain White Background iGoogle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cogdogblog.com/2008/05/23/igoogle-artist-themes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/05/23/igoogle-artist-themes/</link>
	<description>Alan Levine&#039;s space for barking about and playing with technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:33:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Levine aka CogDog</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/05/23/igoogle-artist-themes/comment-page-1/#comment-55570</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Levine aka CogDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 21:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=2348#comment-55570</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the stylin&#039; suggestions, Jason-- these are those things that swim on the edge of my awareness in the zone of &quot;one day I&#039;ll ma esome time to chrome my Firefoxing...&quot;

Sorry about the spam link trap, I had a pretty low number set to trigger than, and have since bumped it up- when spammers link dump its usually like 100 links, so I ought not to punish those sharing legit links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the stylin&#8217; suggestions, Jason&#8211; these are those things that swim on the edge of my awareness in the zone of &#8220;one day I&#8217;ll ma esome time to chrome my Firefoxing&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry about the spam link trap, I had a pretty low number set to trigger than, and have since bumped it up- when spammers link dump its usually like 100 links, so I ought not to punish those sharing legit links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Priem</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/05/23/igoogle-artist-themes/comment-page-1/#comment-55569</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Priem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 19:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=2348#comment-55569</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;ve got a good point: from Lasceaux to the modern day, it&#039;s hard to find an artifact that no one has &quot;frittered&quot; some time away in decorating.  This aesthetic impulse is, as you say, a &#039;core value&#039;--one of the characteristics of being human.  Software designers neglect it at their own peril, as usability and, ultimately, productivity suffer when this core value is forgotten.  Noam Tractinsky (among others working in HCI) makes this point more eloquently and at greater length; I recommend &quot;Toward the study of aesthetics in information technology&quot; as an introduction.

There are a few other customization tools you might have mentioned, as well.  The most popular of these is probably the &#039;Stylish&#039; Firefox add-on.  It lets you easily modify your userContent.css stylesheet to define custom rules for how Fx displays certain--or all--websites.  It&#039;s also pretty easy to modify userContent.css manually.

If you&#039;re comfortable working in CSS, you can write your own rules; or, you can download them fully-formed from userstyles.org.  As I recall, there were several google search skins.  Given some people&#039;s recent concern over the &lt;a href=&quot;http://ecoiron.blogspot.com/2007/08/history-in-january-2007-mark-ontkush.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;energy-wasting default Google&lt;/a&gt; interface, you&#039;re even doing the planet a (tiny) favor if you switch to a darker theme :)

Finally, don&#039;t even get me started on the awesomeness of editing Firefox&#039;s userChrome.css to control the interface of Fx itself; I guess I&#039;ll have to write a post on that later.

PS: I tried to include links to all of the above, but the spam filter killed my comment, and I had to write it again.  Google and Google Scholar (for the Tractinsky piece) should find everything easily enough, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ve got a good point: from Lasceaux to the modern day, it&#8217;s hard to find an artifact that no one has &#8220;frittered&#8221; some time away in decorating.  This aesthetic impulse is, as you say, a &#8216;core value&#8217;&#8211;one of the characteristics of being human.  Software designers neglect it at their own peril, as usability and, ultimately, productivity suffer when this core value is forgotten.  Noam Tractinsky (among others working in HCI) makes this point more eloquently and at greater length; I recommend &#8220;Toward the study of aesthetics in information technology&#8221; as an introduction.</p>
<p>There are a few other customization tools you might have mentioned, as well.  The most popular of these is probably the &#8216;Stylish&#8217; Firefox add-on.  It lets you easily modify your userContent.css stylesheet to define custom rules for how Fx displays certain&#8211;or all&#8211;websites.  It&#8217;s also pretty easy to modify userContent.css manually.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re comfortable working in CSS, you can write your own rules; or, you can download them fully-formed from userstyles.org.  As I recall, there were several google search skins.  Given some people&#8217;s recent concern over the <a href="http://ecoiron.blogspot.com/2007/08/history-in-january-2007-mark-ontkush.html" rel="nofollow">energy-wasting default Google</a> interface, you&#8217;re even doing the planet a (tiny) favor if you switch to a darker theme <img src='http://cogdogblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Finally, don&#8217;t even get me started on the awesomeness of editing Firefox&#8217;s userChrome.css to control the interface of Fx itself; I guess I&#8217;ll have to write a post on that later.</p>
<p>PS: I tried to include links to all of the above, but the spam filter killed my comment, and I had to write it again.  Google and Google Scholar (for the Tractinsky piece) should find everything easily enough, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Levine aka CogDog</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/05/23/igoogle-artist-themes/comment-page-1/#comment-55568</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Levine aka CogDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 21:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=2348#comment-55568</guid>
		<description>Ouch, that seems to be a bad link from the ITConversations site, cause the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/cse?q=Ze+Frank&amp;cx=016267578062045709963%3Aoprzynyfchu&amp;cof=FORID%3A0&amp;sa=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;search there shows it as a link&lt;/a&gt; -- I have a copy I can post somewhere; I guess maybe he said &quot;penis&quot; too many times.

Yeah the widgets each are hitting a server, but the load time seems to be not all that awful, and its worth it for me to see my Gmail inbox, latest del.icio.us stuff from others, and my random flickr photo. What I *really* like is the Google Browser sync extension for Firefox, that makes my experience the same no matter what computer I use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch, that seems to be a bad link from the ITConversations site, cause the <a href="http://www.google.com/cse?q=Ze+Frank&#038;cx=016267578062045709963%3Aoprzynyfchu&#038;cof=FORID%3A0&#038;sa=" rel="nofollow">search there shows it as a link</a> &#8212; I have a copy I can post somewhere; I guess maybe he said &#8220;penis&#8221; too many times.</p>
<p>Yeah the widgets each are hitting a server, but the load time seems to be not all that awful, and its worth it for me to see my Gmail inbox, latest del.icio.us stuff from others, and my random flickr photo. What I *really* like is the Google Browser sync extension for Firefox, that makes my experience the same no matter what computer I use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Leslie</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/05/23/igoogle-artist-themes/comment-page-1/#comment-55567</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 20:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=2348#comment-55567</guid>
		<description>Hey, so the Ze Frank link seems broken.

I still resist using the iGoogle homepage for a few reasons. One of them is load time. I currently use a local html page as my homepage, with links to all the servers I maintain on it. The one advantage, clearly, is the network availability/cross-machine access of iGoogle. I do think you are right that the ability to personalize, even small things like images, is not trivial to getting people to feel like software is &#039;theirs&#039;, but I&#039;ve found (especially with dynamic themes that switch images) that this just compounds the problem.

I will give it another try, as it&#039;s probably an &#039;old habits die hard&#039; kind of thing, but I haven&#039;t personally been won over yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, so the Ze Frank link seems broken.</p>
<p>I still resist using the iGoogle homepage for a few reasons. One of them is load time. I currently use a local html page as my homepage, with links to all the servers I maintain on it. The one advantage, clearly, is the network availability/cross-machine access of iGoogle. I do think you are right that the ability to personalize, even small things like images, is not trivial to getting people to feel like software is &#8216;theirs&#8217;, but I&#8217;ve found (especially with dynamic themes that switch images) that this just compounds the problem.</p>
<p>I will give it another try, as it&#8217;s probably an &#8216;old habits die hard&#8217; kind of thing, but I haven&#8217;t personally been won over yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Levine aka CogDog</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/05/23/igoogle-artist-themes/comment-page-1/#comment-55566</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Levine aka CogDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 15:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=2348#comment-55566</guid>
		<description>Ain&#039;t no betters here, just the dogs of the &#039;net.

At least we have the choice to go plain or decorated, is that reasonable? And this is not my search page, its just where the browser bops when it opens. Ny search page is command-K (cursor to the Firefox search bar), type, press return to white page search results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ain&#8217;t no betters here, just the dogs of the &#8216;net.</p>
<p>At least we have the choice to go plain or decorated, is that reasonable? And this is not my search page, its just where the browser bops when it opens. Ny search page is command-K (cursor to the Firefox search bar), type, press return to white page search results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phaedral</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/05/23/igoogle-artist-themes/comment-page-1/#comment-55565</link>
		<dc:creator>phaedral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 14:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=2348#comment-55565</guid>
		<description>I have this habit of disagreeing with my betters.  There is no more desire today to clutter my search page than there was back in the day.  And while not a certified Google Conspiracy Theorist, I am increasingly annoyed (not even really _concerned_ so much as annoyed) by gigantic entities seeking to dem me down to the last bit.  Thanks, but no thanks, I&#039;ll be keeping to the plainest default...and only allowing cookies to last the session. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have this habit of disagreeing with my betters.  There is no more desire today to clutter my search page than there was back in the day.  And while not a certified Google Conspiracy Theorist, I am increasingly annoyed (not even really _concerned_ so much as annoyed) by gigantic entities seeking to dem me down to the last bit.  Thanks, but no thanks, I&#8217;ll be keeping to the plainest default&#8230;and only allowing cookies to last the session. <img src='http://cogdogblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
