<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: G-G, Negative Content, and Blogging Rarely Is Ok</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cogdogblog.com/2008/06/03/g-g/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/06/03/g-g/</link>
	<description>Alan Levine&#039;s space for barking about and playing with technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 17:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garfield Minus Garfield &#124; Cosmopoetica</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/06/03/g-g/comment-page-1/#comment-55633</link>
		<dc:creator>Garfield Minus Garfield &#124; Cosmopoetica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=2367#comment-55633</guid>
		<description>[...] [subconscious linktribution: CogDogBlog] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [subconscious linktribution: CogDogBlog] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexanderhayes</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/06/03/g-g/comment-page-1/#comment-55632</link>
		<dc:creator>alexanderhayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 23:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=2367#comment-55632</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for reductionist thinking.

Perhaps Jim Davis could switch Garfields tone and speak of more important matters - http://www.mnftiu.cc/mnftiu.cc/war74.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for reductionist thinking.</p>
<p>Perhaps Jim Davis could switch Garfields tone and speak of more important matters &#8211; <a href="http://www.mnftiu.cc/mnftiu.cc/war74.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mnftiu.cc/mnftiu.cc/war74.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gardner</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/06/03/g-g/comment-page-1/#comment-55609</link>
		<dc:creator>Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=2367#comment-55609</guid>
		<description>Now THIS is amazing. Walsh&#039;s idea could be generalized/mutated/mashed into a whole series of interesting analytical/creative assignments for students. This kind of stuff gets me fully jazzed because it&#039;s so clearly driven both by inspiration and by careful, deliberate thought. 

Think about a film studies class where we could take actors out of certain scenes and just watch other actors respond to them. What a great way to study acting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now THIS is amazing. Walsh&#8217;s idea could be generalized/mutated/mashed into a whole series of interesting analytical/creative assignments for students. This kind of stuff gets me fully jazzed because it&#8217;s so clearly driven both by inspiration and by careful, deliberate thought. </p>
<p>Think about a film studies class where we could take actors out of certain scenes and just watch other actors respond to them. What a great way to study acting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

