<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Dog Wags for A Calico</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cogdogblog.com/2008/08/20/calico/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/08/20/calico/</link>
	<description>Alan Levine&#039;s space for barking about and playing with technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:29:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Levine aka CogDog</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/08/20/calico/comment-page-1/#comment-56064</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Levine aka CogDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=2644#comment-56064</guid>
		<description>Calico basically is the same stitch engine as Autostitch. I have seen this happen a few times and my hunch is when there is enough difference in the overlap area (people/objects moving, I think a boat had moved in this one) that it cannot register the points sufficiently, so it just drops the images</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calico basically is the same stitch engine as Autostitch. I have seen this happen a few times and my hunch is when there is enough difference in the overlap area (people/objects moving, I think a boat had moved in this one) that it cannot register the points sufficiently, so it just drops the images</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D'Arcy Norman</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/08/20/calico/comment-page-1/#comment-56063</link>
		<dc:creator>D'Arcy Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=2644#comment-56063</guid>
		<description>Just realized - it looks like both Autostitch and Calico barfed on the bridge in your pano - did they choke on it, or did you not add those frames?

I tried to do a pano of Hanauma Bay a couple of years ago, but Autostitch refused to handle the mouth of the bay and I wound up with two separate unconnected panos of each side...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just realized &#8211; it looks like both Autostitch and Calico barfed on the bridge in your pano &#8211; did they choke on it, or did you not add those frames?</p>
<p>I tried to do a pano of Hanauma Bay a couple of years ago, but Autostitch refused to handle the mouth of the bay and I wound up with two separate unconnected panos of each side&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D'Arcy Norman</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/08/20/calico/comment-page-1/#comment-56062</link>
		<dc:creator>D'Arcy Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=2644#comment-56062</guid>
		<description>Gotta LOVE Calico. I&#039;d purchased a license back in Sept, but the software wasn&#039;t working quite as well as DoubleTake at the time. It looks like it&#039;s been much improved - I just tested a rendering of the pano I shot in my office, and it was MUCH faster than Autostitch on Windows, and rendered a full resolution version as well (Autostitch and/or Windows ran out of memory when trying to do that...)

Thanks for the reminder about Calico! I&#039;ll be shooting more panos with it :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta LOVE Calico. I&#8217;d purchased a license back in Sept, but the software wasn&#8217;t working quite as well as DoubleTake at the time. It looks like it&#8217;s been much improved &#8211; I just tested a rendering of the pano I shot in my office, and it was MUCH faster than Autostitch on Windows, and rendered a full resolution version as well (Autostitch and/or Windows ran out of memory when trying to do that&#8230;)</p>
<p>Thanks for the reminder about Calico! I&#8217;ll be shooting more panos with it :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Levine aka CogDog</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/08/20/calico/comment-page-1/#comment-56060</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Levine aka CogDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=2644#comment-56060</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kisa! I meant to look to see what it would take for the panos to be put in Stephane Zugzwang&#039;s Virtual Reality Room</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kisa! I meant to look to see what it would take for the panos to be put in Stephane Zugzwang&#8217;s Virtual Reality Room</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kisa Naumova</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2008/08/20/calico/comment-page-1/#comment-56059</link>
		<dc:creator>Kisa Naumova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=2644#comment-56059</guid>
		<description>One of the great things to do with panoramas is to make them into Quicktime VR objects. Then you can immerse yourself in Second Life

You&#039;ve probably come across it, but if not, have a look for Hugin (http://hugin.sourceforge.net/). It&#039;s rather wonderful (if a little fiddly) and what I&#039;ve found is that it will take the files that commercial demo software AutoPano Pro saves, and render them for free</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the great things to do with panoramas is to make them into Quicktime VR objects. Then you can immerse yourself in Second Life</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve probably come across it, but if not, have a look for Hugin (<a href="http://hugin.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://hugin.sourceforge.net/</a>). It&#8217;s rather wonderful (if a little fiddly) and what I&#8217;ve found is that it will take the files that commercial demo software AutoPano Pro saves, and render them for free</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

