Nor for profit says nothing about how much employees get paid; it has to do with not having shareholders who share profits- as long as $ is turned back to the organization, it keeps that status c.f.
http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Anot-for-profit

I understand where you are asking, and perhaps they should be completely open about that. I would not want Jimmy’s job, and guess the demands/travel exact a personal toll. But yeah, if Jimmy drives a ’84 Gremlin and eats beans, money can go further.

My question… if you could call my post a question… was not so subtly wondering about how much people inside the Wikimedia team get paid. Take out the technological expenses from that 6 million… and you start to get an idea how much Jimmy gets paid, and the other 23 people in the team, and the cost of Mania is a little manic. I wonder.. what is the definition of not-for-profit? is comparing Wikimedia corporate costs like comparing chickens to roosters? At what point do we start asking the question I am nudging at? Could the money go further if Jimmy lived in India?