<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Courses As Commodities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cogdogblog.com/2012/07/10/courses-as-commodities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2012/07/10/courses-as-commodities/</link>
	<description>Alan Levine Barks Here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:02:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Guess What [some] Consultants do is Steal - CogDogBlog</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2012/07/10/courses-as-commodities/comment-page-1/#comment-151625</link>
		<dc:creator>I Guess What [some] Consultants do is Steal - CogDogBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 20:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=9127#comment-151625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is a total lifting of my original blog post, Courses as Commodities, published in its [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a total lifting of my original blog post, Courses as Commodities, published in its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courses As Commodities &#124; Gilfus Education Group</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2012/07/10/courses-as-commodities/comment-page-1/#comment-151607</link>
		<dc:creator>Courses As Commodities &#124; Gilfus Education Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=9127#comment-151607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Email [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Email [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marissa Lowman</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2012/07/10/courses-as-commodities/comment-page-1/#comment-136907</link>
		<dc:creator>Marissa Lowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 21:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=9127#comment-136907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We at GatherEducation agree that student engagement is the missing link in MOOCs right now and advocate a blended learning model that allows teachers to incorporate online learning into their classrooms without having to alter their teaching style.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We at GatherEducation agree that student engagement is the missing link in MOOCs right now and advocate a blended learning model that allows teachers to incorporate online learning into their classrooms without having to alter their teaching style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly List Bookmarks (weekly) &#124; Eccentric Eclectica @ ToddSuomela.com</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2012/07/10/courses-as-commodities/comment-page-1/#comment-135515</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly List Bookmarks (weekly) &#124; Eccentric Eclectica @ ToddSuomela.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 00:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=9127#comment-135515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Courses As Commodities &#8211; CogDogBlog [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Courses As Commodities &#8211; CogDogBlog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Little Mayonnaise and Hold the Conversation &#124; The Transparent University</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2012/07/10/courses-as-commodities/comment-page-1/#comment-135385</link>
		<dc:creator>A Little Mayonnaise and Hold the Conversation &#124; The Transparent University</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=9127#comment-135385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Alan Levine&#8217;s post today got me thinking about deli sandwiches. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alan Levine&#8217;s post today got me thinking about deli sandwiches. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Levine aka CogDog</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2012/07/10/courses-as-commodities/comment-page-1/#comment-135378</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Levine aka CogDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 05:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=9127#comment-135378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;interesting&quot;? you freakin inspired me!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;interesting&#8221;? you freakin inspired me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Branson Smith</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2012/07/10/courses-as-commodities/comment-page-1/#comment-135376</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Branson Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 02:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=9127#comment-135376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the vein of Orwell, this post reminded my of an article I came across, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.springerlink.com/content/m22338674r552146/fulltext.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Is there an ethics of algorithms?&lt;/a&gt;. It talked about the subjective nature of programmers defining the reading of electronic scans of people for possible cancers. Literally there are shades of gray.

So I instantly worry about the notions of an algorithmically examined essay. The programmers building tools to evaluate the essay likely define a set of metrics which makes for good writing based on others&#039; writing as you suggested. But what makes good writing is really not so easily defined. 

Trusting an &#039;expert&#039;s&#039; analysis of good writing is where my hackles go up and I feel the robotics being inserted in the back of my head.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the vein of Orwell, this post reminded my of an article I came across, <a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/m22338674r552146/fulltext.html" rel="nofollow">Is there an ethics of algorithms?</a>. It talked about the subjective nature of programmers defining the reading of electronic scans of people for possible cancers. Literally there are shades of gray.</p>
<p>So I instantly worry about the notions of an algorithmically examined essay. The programmers building tools to evaluate the essay likely define a set of metrics which makes for good writing based on others&#8217; writing as you suggested. But what makes good writing is really not so easily defined. </p>
<p>Trusting an &#8216;expert&#8217;s&#8217; analysis of good writing is where my hackles go up and I feel the robotics being inserted in the back of my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike C.</title>
		<link>http://cogdogblog.com/2012/07/10/courses-as-commodities/comment-page-1/#comment-135374</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 01:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cogdogblog.com/?p=9127#comment-135374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might find this interesting: http://hapgood.us/2012/07/09/the-residential-online-consensus-builds/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might find this interesting: <a href="http://hapgood.us/2012/07/09/the-residential-online-consensus-builds/" rel="nofollow">http://hapgood.us/2012/07/09/the-residential-online-consensus-builds/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
