Unlike many tea partiers I’ve been pleased with my experience getting ACA Healthcare (get the name right, willya, labeling it ObamaCare gives your bias away). I found the signup smooth, and have had above par service when I have called them with questions.
As a self-employed Type 1 Diabetic, without it, I’d likely be (a) without healthcare or (b) without a home for the cost of care the TPers would leave me with. For a shade under the monthly cost I paid until March 2014 for a COBRA insurance plan (it expired), I was able to get a comparable Blue Cross / Blue Shield health care plan plus a Cigna Delta insurance one. I kept my doctors, but had to shift to a different prescription provider.
By the way, this is costing me, out of my pocket, $500 per month. Please thank your employer, give them a hug, for covering your plans.
Getting the plan is one thing, and I am finding that getting benefits brings up unexpected challenges, that make me wonder is about HealthCare or InsuranceCOmpanyCare?
Case 1: The Blood Test Strip Monopoly
A key part of managing diabetes is regular checking of blood glucose levels. Like razors, computer printers, they give away the device, but collect on the refillables- vials of blood test strips.
So I test my blood levels on a device like this
and the particular meter, a LifeScan one, was built to send the results wirelessly to my insulin pump
From there I can estimate how much I plan to eat for a meal, and the pump calculates a proper insulin dosage based on that and the number sent by the blood test meter.
My challenge happened last year, because I accidentally left my blood test meter on a plane. When I looked into getting a replacement, I found it was not available; in fact I had to switch to a different meter, a Bayer Contour Next, which actually worked better.
This was all fine, because on my previous plan, I could order the Bayer Contour Next test strips from my mail order pharmacy.
Then everything changed with my new plan. I ordered some of these as done before via my new provider, Walgreens. I got a message that said that my insurance company denied coverage for the Bayer blood test strips. When I called, I found out that Blue Cross would cover LifeScan strips at Tier 1 for $15/month but Bayer strips were considered Tier 3 costing me $80/month. In the letter I received:
Based on our review, we cannot approve this request for the non-Lifescan blood glucose meter test strips. This finding is based on the terms of your benefit plan and the MCMSAZ Pharmacy Coverage Guidelines for the non-Lifescan blood glucose meter test strips.
If someone can explain the difference between
I would sure like to know. I might suspect that the LifeScan company ponies up something to get an exclusive line to patients?
To me, having the numbers sent from my blood test meter to the pump is a nice feature that streamlines the process, but honesty, not totally critical- I can manually enter them. I could just switch to the LifeScan meter that tests but does not send the data.
Of course, there is another option. As my diabetic friend suggested, I can order the Bayer test strips on Amazon.com for $15/monthly supply. Cut out the pharmacy and the health insurance completely.
Makes one wonder what the overhead is for? Or why this arbitrary rule that costs them more to enforce and administer in paperwork?
Pre-Existing Is Not Pre-Existing
My idea of the ACA was that it freed people from the constraints of restrictions for pre-existing conditions. But I found out that does not apply to my Cigna dental insurance.
In late February 2014, I went to my dentists under the care of my preceding plan. I was told I needed a filling, but I decided to wait until my new dental plan went into effect, March 1, 2014. As usual, I ended up putting this off, but ending up seeing my dentist on
August 27, 2014 August 7, 2014. They supposedly checked my coverage– but.
The “but” was I got a call a week after from my dentist office letting me know that Cigna had a 6 month waiting period on any work beyond checkups.
Waiting period. Isn’t that like a pre-exiting condition exclusion?
My dentist office filed an appeal.
Yesterday a letter arrived from Cigna letting me know they declined the appeal, and thus I was responsible for the payment of dental care for which I thought I had coverage for.
Let’s check the calendar. Six months from the start of the plan is September 1;
my visit was 5 days prior. My mistake, it was actually 24 days. That is, of course huge. Five days.
I fired off one those I Have Twitter and Will Complain things, and got a rather quick response meaning that Cigna is listening for mentions of their company name in social media.
@cogdog Hi Alan. I can look into your benefits and the claim for you. Please email me at LetUsHelpU@cigna.com. I'd be glad to try and help.
— Customer Service (@Cignaquestions) September 20, 2014
It looks like they are being responsive. Companies do this alot, then shuttle you to a DM or email, so their support/lack is never seen again. I pressed for a public response, got none.
I sent an email.
I resent the email, which was received somewhere on the internet.
@cogdog Hi Alan. I haven't received your email. Would you mind resending to LetUsHelpU@cigna.com? I'll let you know once I've received it.
— Customer Service (@Cignaquestions) September 20, 2014
I resent it 8 times.
I figured, well, if they do not know how to read email, I can just sent the info. Public.
— Alan Levine ? (@cogdog) September 20, 2014
They still pressed for email, asking for my email in a DM.
I refuse to take this into a private channel. Support me in public, will ya? I tweeted my email address.
Oh, I was supposed to use their “secure” email. This means that the https email I use all the time is much less secure than the web site I log into and read.
They will “be looking into this”.
Let’s see what they are on the table for. The bill from my dentist was discounted $100 insurance rate to $210. If covered on Cigna insurance, knock off $50 for my deductible, that gets it to $160 they might cover. Then knock off $32 for the 20% I would pay for the coverage.
This means Cigna is screwing me over a $128 coverage for treatment they might pay for a freaking technicality of 5 days too soon? (consider I have already paid them $180 in premiums this year).
Next year, I will drop Cigna like an anvil; I will brush and floss regularly and pay as I go for my teeth.
In both cases, I am lost to understand the efficiency of administrative overhead (the mailings, the staff cost of processing appeals) for what to me are extremely arbitrary rules that have nothing to do with healthcare.
Yep, it is a smooth operating thing of beauty.
UPDATE September 23, 2014: No word at all from Cigna via twitter, their secure email, or any other transmission. I am spending my time tonight writing an appeal letter.
UPDATE October 4, 2014:
The response to my appeal:
I am sorry for the delay. The call history was reviewed on your account and unfortunately an exception cannot be made. The waiting period applies and the dental office called in after the service to inquire about the waiting period.
- I will not renew my CIGNA dental insurance when open enrollment occurs in November.
- I will continue to let people in social media know CIGNA treated my claim.
UPDATE October 10, 2014:
Oh man, they asked for it. Cigna sent me a customer experience survey. Here’s looking at your data:
UPDATE October 12, 2014:
Upon returning home from my trip is a letter from Cigna stating that my case goes to a review board October 22, 2014. I can participate via a phone call. I wavered whether to do this– if followed to the letter, I have no case to stand on. I did not read my plan details closely and my dentist did not check my coverage sufficiently, ergo Cigna is not responsible.
But I am curious to hear how this pans out.