<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
 <rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
     <title>cogdogblog: 3 LO Searches for 1 Query: Merlot's Federated Search Comments and Trackbacks</title>
     <link>http://cogdogblog.com/alan/archives/2003/11/17/3_lo_searches_for_1_.php</link>
     <description>Zoom-zoom. More power for those looking for learning objects or instructional resources. MERLOT's Federated Search allows you to enter keywords (say "cell mitosis") and with one click conduct a search of MERLOT, Australia's )EdNA Online, and the Science Math resources...</description>
     <language>en-us</language>
     <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 11:47:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
     <generator>Movable Type v2.661</generator>
     <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>CDB Entry: 3 LO Searches for 1 Query: Merlot's Federated Search</title>
      <description>Zoom-zoom. More power for those looking for learning objects or instructional resources. MERLOT's Federated Search allows you to enter keywords (say &quot;cell mitosis&quot;) and with one click conduct a search of MERLOT, Australia's )EdNA Online, and the Science Math resources...</description>
      <link>http://cogdogblog.com/alan/archives/2003/11/17/3_lo_searches_for_1_.php</link>
       <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:15:36 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
        <item>
     <title>comment by: Scott Leslie</title>
     <description>&lt;p&gt;It would be interesting (to me at least) to find out how they decide on the comparative relevancies of results from different catalogs. I liked the fact that the default result seemed to be by relevance across catalogs, but couldn't puzzle out (nor did there seem to be any material supporting) why any result was higher than the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
     <link>http://cogdogblog.com/alan/archives/2003/11/17/3_lo_searches_for_1_.php#319</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2003 16:38:33 -0700</pubDate>
     </item>
        <item>
     <title>comment by: Alan Levine</title>
     <description>&lt;p&gt;I cannot recall what they said during the MERLOT presentation, but would guess the ranking is pretty simple such as occurrence count of keywords...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
     <link>http://cogdogblog.com/alan/archives/2003/11/17/3_lo_searches_for_1_.php#320</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2003 16:50:24 -0700</pubDate>
     </item>
        <item>
     <title>comment by: Stephen Downes</title>
     <description>&lt;p&gt;Gee, and Google only gives you one search for a query....&lt;/p&gt;</description>
     <link>http://cogdogblog.com/alan/archives/2003/11/17/3_lo_searches_for_1_.php#321</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:28:56 -0700</pubDate>
     </item>
        <item>
     <title>comment by: Alan Levine</title>
     <description>&lt;p&gt;and Google gives you all those thousands of other matches that are not learning objects (porn too!)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
     <link>http://cogdogblog.com/alan/archives/2003/11/18/3_lo_searches_for_1_.php#327</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2003 18:59:22 -0700</pubDate>
     </item>
    

 
  </channel>
</rss>