<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
 <rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
     <title>cogdogblog: Web 5.0 Did I miss the Upgrade? Comments and Trackbacks</title>
     <link>http://cogdogblog.com/alan/archives/2005/04/26/web2.php</link>
     <description>I've been seeing references to something called "Web 2.0" -- was there some sort of Internet upgrade while I was sleeping? Am I out of date? (Note for new readers- this is sarcasm) I see folks are aiming to define...</description>
     <language>en-us</language>
     <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 11:28:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
     <generator>Movable Type v2.661</generator>
     <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>CDB Entry: Web 5.0 Did I miss the Upgrade?</title>
      <description>I've been seeing references to something called &quot;Web 2.0&quot; -- was there some sort of Internet upgrade while I was sleeping? Am I out of date? (Note for new readers- this is sarcasm) I see folks are aiming to define...</description>
      <link>http://cogdogblog.com/alan/archives/2005/04/26/web2.php</link>
       <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:17:45 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
        <item>
     <title>comment by: Roland Tanglao</title>
     <description>&lt;p&gt;We didn't invent the &quot;Web 2.0&quot; concept. the O'Reilly conference crowd did, they even had a Web 2.0 conference about it last year!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
     <link>http://cogdogblog.com/alan/archives/2005/04/27/web2.php#2471</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:51:09 -0700</pubDate>
     </item>
        <item>
     <title>comment by: Jim Wilde</title>
     <description>&lt;p&gt;Hey,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Good point. Dan Gillmor wrote about web 2.0 the other day. Of course, I am in favor of it since I can do more interesting things besides read content. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
     <link>http://cogdogblog.com/alan/archives/2005/04/27/web2.php#2473</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:22:15 -0700</pubDate>
     </item>
    

 
  </channel>
</rss>