At the Speed of Link Farm Spam
At the Speed of Link Farm Spam posted 25 Nov ’07, 7.56am MST PST on flickr

It took less than 5 hours after a recent blog post for this first link farm spam trackback to arrive.

As bad as that is, the give credit to someone else or am I really known as "Kick-Fiend"?

Hello Google! Your Page Rank incentive is killing us bloggers! Do Something!


And the problem is Google. Sure, “Do No Evil” is a snappy tag line, but in terms of providing the incentive for link spammers that clog us bloggers along every reach of the long tail- Google sits idly by, collecting Adsense $ and does nothing.

With all that incredible brain power that can develop cool apps and services, is it possible they cannot throw a few engineers at the problem and put some better logic into search that would punish link spammers?

So perhaps that does not qualify as “evil” but it is not “good”.

I am ready for some public action, are you? As a bloger, do you enjoy filtering out spam from your blog? Does it consume any of your time dealing with unwanted, unconnected comments/trackback spam that hit your blog?

Google- We have a Problem.

The post "Google We Have a Problem" was originally dropped like a smoking hot potato at CogDogBlog (http://cogdogblog.com/2007/11/google-we-have-a-problem/) on November 25, 2007.

8 Comments

  • Chris Craft crucialthought.com

    I’ve recently been having the exact same problem. What I want to know is how to deal with it! I’ve got Spam Karma 2 turned to Supastrong on trackback spam and still get it like crazy.

    How are you handling this because I am ready to turn off trackbacks entirely!

    Chris

  • Stephen Downes downes.ca

    I’m just really tired of it in general – in my email, in my blog, everywhere I look.

    And – it’s just so tacky. So putrid. So vile. People ask me why I am so ant-capitalism (etc) and I point to spam, and I say *this* is what they think is appropriate.

    We need to design against spam. Google won’t help us. And even if Google did, some other company would come along to monetize it.

  • I’m getting tons of the same stuff, and sometimes it’s only minutes after I post. It’s driving me nuts. I’m with you, something needs to be done … spam harvesters don’t cut it.

  • Tom Carding tcarding.blogspot.com

    In the last couple of weeks google has altered its page rank algorithm to deal with link spammers. A lot of people’s pagerank dropped dramticaly as a result. I guess Google are trusting to natural selection to weed the garden…

  • Stephen Downes downes.ca

    I just encountered this site…
    http://whydiggisblocked.com/

    From Digg, naturally
    http://digg.com/tech_news/Why_Digg_is_Blocked

    and it occurs to me that we have, collectively, the answer in our own hands: block Google.

    Oh I know, nobody wants to do that, it’s the kiss of internet death – but it might be worth doing it for one day, just to make a point.

    Thoughts?

  • 益学会 > OLDaily 中文版 » Blog Archive » 2007å¹´11月26æ—¥ 重写规则,Camtasia协议,blog将死,OLPC教育计划,Kindle edu2do.com/oldaily/november-26-2007

    […] 是时候书写属于我们自己的规则了 回应Facebook近期的喧哗(见后续内容),Doc Searles在这个帖子和随后的帖子中, 主张我们应该“停止祈求Facebookå’ŒGoogle为我们解决问题”,“是时候创造某些新的参与规则了--一些象它们一样有效的规则。” 的确如此。但与此同时,大量的金钱却被耗费来阻止这种现象的发生。人们花钱让我们购买专业的电子书阅读器,花钱阻止开源应用被用于孩子的教育,花钱使我们去相信我们所拥有的“给予和分享”等价值观,实际上并不道德,而等同于偷窃。让我表述得更清楚些:我赞同Searles,这就是为什么我曾建议“远离Google的一天”。还想说明,这并不是一种姿态,需要实际行动。Doc Searles, Weblog November 26, 2007 [原文链接] [Tags: Books, Google, Open Source] [参与评论] […]

  • Stephen said, “…it’s just so tacky. So putrid. So vile. People ask me why I am so ant-capitalism (etc) and I point to spam, and I say *this* is what they think is appropriate.”

    I share this ill feeling when I watch commercials on television, and actually hate those more than I hate spam, because while spam may be more virulent in some of its strains, for the most part it’s quiet and easy to ignore. My position on it, however, is that consumers are going to grow so sick of it that they develop “banner blindness” to it in any and all forms, and thus it will ultimately be deemed a waste of time and money by the corporate sponsors. The nice thing about the connected world we are building is it allows for individuals to instantly search for, save, personalize, and control their own access to products and services, making in-your-face and often misleading advertising a thing of the past. I may be the idealistic capitalist in saying so, but I truly believe that sort of populism will whittle away at the annoyance

  • Why I’m A Fan Of The Edublog Awards « UK Web Focus ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/why-im-a-fan-of-the-edublog-awards

    […] I suspect that Stephen Downes’ comment that “… the internet is already awash with really vile and intrusive commercial activity“  (which I mentioned in that post will be regarded by the […]

Leave a Comment

All fields are required. Your email address will not be published.