I long dreamed of playing guitar through a stack of Marshall amps.
The problem for anyone in range would be my horrible musical signal going in. But that’s not the topic of this post.
If I have learned anything in my unplanned career in online stuff it’s the value of putting ideas, questions out there, and sometimes to often, getting a very useful response. But it’s not usually directly from the signal I put out there, it was because someone else in my network, amplified my signal.
I thought I could find relevant links for this, my first search on “network amplification” got mostly results on Denial of Service attacks. And most of my additions of keywords got mostly things more related to marketing, and gaming social media systems to “boost your brand”.
I experienced this as a receiver of amplification early on. Way back in 2003, my first year blogging, I wrote about some experiments I was trying in applying RSS inspired by the RSS for Educators paper published by Stephen Downes. I sent him an email with a link to my post as a thanks. Maybe he would offer some feedback?
Well, Stephen never replied.
No, he did way better.
The next day he wrote about my idea in OLDaily his still widely read newsletter. And it was not just “here is something interesting” (the way people just spread links now in social media), you can tell from his words he read my post, looked at my project, and gave it some attention.
I got all kinds of messages from colleagues in my institution and beyond letting me know they had seen me in OLDaily. I felt famous for an Ed-Tech 15 minutes. Stephen has been doing this for a marathon 17 years, look how much of the archive it takes to scroll to the bottom.
Now that I am scrolling back to the top in time, I may not have the power of Stephen’s Marshall Stacks, but I have some. This is coming into play in several different places recently, and becoming a strategy I am putting to use in the MA Thesis Seminar class I am teaching, where I am trying to fold into the mix the benefits of networks and online research tools.
Here is how it works. It’s really un-complicated.
I ask my students to write a blog post with a question or a problem they are trying to address in their thesis work. Then I share the link with others, sometimes through social media.
Here is a post from Marissa who is seeking ideas for applying simple to use digital humanities tools to dystopian youth adult literature.
So I first did the easy amplification via twitter
— Alan Levine (@cogdog) September 20, 2017
I think it triggered a comment or two, but mostly likes and retweets. Now if there is something like a Blooms Taxonomy for Network Participation, I would not even give likes/retweets a basal layer, it would be maybe a small stone beneath one corner.
The thing with social media as signal is that there is not much power in the signal (unless you are Verified with 100,000s of followers). I am not audio engineer, but if you take a very small signal and plug into a big amp, you end up distorting it or getting maybe nothing.
I’m not saying there is no value in social media sharing, but it seems it takes a whole lot of effort / luck to get more than a handful of likes / retweets. My students really need a bit more, people, so please give more. Give real feedback, real comments. Read their ideas, like Stephen read mine 14 years ago.
But that’s not the only amplification I do- what is more effective is emailing that link or a request to someone I know in the field that might be able to help. This has much more payback, I have already seen at least 3 times with my current students. An email to/from someone you trust, on behalf of someone newer in the field, is a much more powerful amplification.
I sent Marissa’s link, and an intro, to a colleague in Writing Studies, who not only provided ideas, but connected my student with one of her graduate students, and there has been a back and forth of exchange.
It works in other places.
He approached me about advising him on a project idea he has to document his own learning process in completing his under graduate degree (as an adult) from an online institution. Mark has ideas to use some fancy database technology I may never understand, and structured taxonomies, and tagging, and…
I offered to connect him with a few colleagues I thought could give him input, but rather than me trying to fumbling explain Marks’s idea, I asked him to blog it first. Which he did, check out My College Degree as a Digital Humanities Project (and leave comments!).
Having a thought out, open thinking blog post, at a fixed URL, that does not spill over the edge of a social media firehose surrounded by the other gunk, is so much more of a signal that can be amplified.
One more example. One of the participants in the Ontario Extend Project I was part of over the summer direct messaged me a question for advice on a kind of technology I really have no real experience in looking at. Even if I did, an answer sent via a private channel might help her, but it leaves out perhaps other people. In the network.
So Laura wrote the post (and also included a bonus featured image of a cute dog). I almost forget my promise to amplify, but caught my lapse yesterday
— Alan Levine (@cogdog) September 24, 2017
I am more convinced that documenting, writing out a need in a place of your own (domain? yes!) as an anchor, as reference, has more initial potential in it that a single message tossed into the pool of social media.
There is of course no guarantee any of this will produce helpful responses, and so my talk of the effectiveness on my students work is really depending in the network coming through. That’s you. So please, when you can go beyond a like/retweet, and write a good old fashioned comment.
This is in my
self-class-interest! Look at these beautiful posts craving some attention, attenuation, amplification, networkification! http://resnetsem.arganee.world/category/blogs/
Turning those amps up to… you know the number.